static char help[] = "Test file for the PCFactorSetShiftType()\n"; /* * Test file for the PCFactorSetShiftType() routine or -pc_factor_shift_type POSITIVE_DEFINITE option. * The test matrix is the example from Kershaw's paper [J.Comp.Phys 1978] * of a positive definite matrix for which ILU(0) will give a negative pivot. * This means that the CG method will break down; the Manteuffel shift * [Math. Comp. 1980] repairs this. * * Run the executable twice: * 1/ without options: the iterative method diverges because of an * indefinite preconditioner * 2/ with -pc_factor_shift_type POSITIVE_DEFINITE option (or comment in the PCFactorSetShiftType() line below): * the method will now successfully converge. * * Contributed by Victor Eijkhout 2003. */ #include int main(int argc,char **argv) { KSP solver; PC prec; Mat A,M; Vec X,B,D; MPI_Comm comm; PetscScalar v; KSPConvergedReason reason; PetscInt i,j,its; PetscErrorCode ierr; ierr = PetscInitialize(&argc,&argv,0,help);if (ierr) return ierr; comm = MPI_COMM_SELF; /* * Construct the Kershaw matrix * and a suitable rhs / initial guess */ CHKERRQ(MatCreateSeqAIJ(comm,4,4,4,0,&A)); CHKERRQ(VecCreateSeq(comm,4,&B)); CHKERRQ(VecDuplicate(B,&X)); for (i=0; i<4; i++) { v = 3; CHKERRQ(MatSetValues(A,1,&i,1,&i,&v,INSERT_VALUES)); v = 1; CHKERRQ(VecSetValues(B,1,&i,&v,INSERT_VALUES)); CHKERRQ(VecSetValues(X,1,&i,&v,INSERT_VALUES)); } i=0; v=0; CHKERRQ(VecSetValues(X,1,&i,&v,INSERT_VALUES)); for (i=0; i<3; i++) { v = -2; j=i+1; CHKERRQ(MatSetValues(A,1,&i,1,&j,&v,INSERT_VALUES)); CHKERRQ(MatSetValues(A,1,&j,1,&i,&v,INSERT_VALUES)); } i=0; j=3; v=2; CHKERRQ(MatSetValues(A,1,&i,1,&j,&v,INSERT_VALUES)); CHKERRQ(MatSetValues(A,1,&j,1,&i,&v,INSERT_VALUES)); CHKERRQ(MatAssemblyBegin(A,MAT_FINAL_ASSEMBLY)); CHKERRQ(MatAssemblyEnd(A,MAT_FINAL_ASSEMBLY)); CHKERRQ(VecAssemblyBegin(B)); CHKERRQ(VecAssemblyEnd(B)); /* * A Conjugate Gradient method * with ILU(0) preconditioning */ CHKERRQ(KSPCreate(comm,&solver)); CHKERRQ(KSPSetOperators(solver,A,A)); CHKERRQ(KSPSetType(solver,KSPCG)); CHKERRQ(KSPSetInitialGuessNonzero(solver,PETSC_TRUE)); /* * ILU preconditioner; * this will break down unless you add the Shift line, * or use the -pc_factor_shift_positive_definite option */ CHKERRQ(KSPGetPC(solver,&prec)); CHKERRQ(PCSetType(prec,PCILU)); /* CHKERRQ(PCFactorSetShiftType(prec,MAT_SHIFT_POSITIVE_DEFINITE)); */ CHKERRQ(KSPSetFromOptions(solver)); CHKERRQ(KSPSetUp(solver)); /* * Now that the factorisation is done, show the pivots; * note that the last one is negative. This in itself is not an error, * but it will make the iterative method diverge. */ CHKERRQ(PCFactorGetMatrix(prec,&M)); CHKERRQ(VecDuplicate(B,&D)); CHKERRQ(MatGetDiagonal(M,D)); /* * Solve the system; * without the shift this will diverge with * an indefinite preconditioner */ CHKERRQ(KSPSolve(solver,B,X)); CHKERRQ(KSPGetConvergedReason(solver,&reason)); if (reason==KSP_DIVERGED_INDEFINITE_PC) { CHKERRQ(PetscPrintf(PETSC_COMM_WORLD,"\nDivergence because of indefinite preconditioner;\n")); CHKERRQ(PetscPrintf(PETSC_COMM_WORLD,"Run the executable again but with '-pc_factor_shift_type POSITIVE_DEFINITE' option.\n")); } else if (reason<0) { CHKERRQ(PetscPrintf(PETSC_COMM_WORLD,"\nOther kind of divergence: this should not happen.\n")); } else { CHKERRQ(KSPGetIterationNumber(solver,&its)); } CHKERRQ(VecDestroy(&X)); CHKERRQ(VecDestroy(&B)); CHKERRQ(VecDestroy(&D)); CHKERRQ(MatDestroy(&A)); CHKERRQ(KSPDestroy(&solver)); ierr = PetscFinalize(); return ierr; } /*TEST test: args: -pc_factor_shift_type positive_definite TEST*/