xref: /libCEED/examples/petsc/index.md (revision ffa5d67cac94379470c78ef400e8bd2c0655d3e7)
1# PETSc demos and BPs
2
3(example-petsc-area)=
4
5## Area
6
7This example is located in the subdirectory {file}`examples/petsc`.
8It demonstrates a simple usage of libCEED with PETSc to calculate the surface area of a closed surface.
9The code uses higher level communication protocols for mesh handling in PETSc's DMPlex.
10This example has the same mathematical formulation as {ref}`Ex1-Volume`, with the exception that the physical coordinates for this problem are $\bm{x}=(x,y,z)\in \mathbb{R}^3$, while the coordinates of the reference element are $\bm{X}=(X,Y) \equiv (X_0,X_1) \in \textrm{I} =[-1,1]^2$.
11
12(example-petsc-area-cube)=
13
14### Cube
15
16This is one of the test cases of the computation of the {ref}`example-petsc-area` of a 2D manifold embedded in 3D.
17This problem can be run with:
18
19```
20./area -problem cube
21```
22
23This example uses the following coordinate transformations for the computation of the geometric factors: from the physical coordinates on the cube, denoted by $\bar{\bm{x}}=(\bar{x},\bar{y},\bar{z})$, and physical coordinates on the discrete surface, denoted by $\bm{{x}}=(x,y)$, to $\bm{X}=(X,Y) \in \textrm{I}$ on the reference element, via the chain rule
24
25$$
26\frac{\partial \bm{x}}{\partial \bm{X}}_{(2\times2)} = \frac{\partial {\bm{x}}}{\partial \bar{\bm{x}}}_{(2\times3)} \frac{\partial \bar{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}}_{(3\times2)},
27$$ (eq-coordinate-transforms-cube)
28
29with Jacobian determinant given by
30
31$$
32\left| J \right| = \left\|col_1\left(\frac{\partial \bar{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}}\right)\right\| \left\|col_2 \left(\frac{\partial \bar{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}}\right) \right\|
33$$ (eq-jacobian-cube)
34
35We note that in equation {eq}`eq-coordinate-transforms-cube`, the right-most Jacobian matrix ${\partial\bar{\bm{x}}}/{\partial \bm{X}}_{(3\times2)}$ is provided by the library, while ${\partial{\bm{x}}}/{\partial \bar{ \bm{x}}}_{(2\times3)}$ is provided by the user as
36
37$$
38\left[ col_1\left(\frac{\partial\bar{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}}\right) / \left\| col_1\left(\frac{\partial\bar{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}}\right)\right\| , col_2\left(\frac{\partial\bar{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}}\right) / \left\| col_2\left(\frac{\partial\bar{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}}\right)\right\| \right]^T_{(2\times 3)}.
39$$
40
41(example-petsc-area-sphere)=
42
43### Sphere
44
45This problem computes the surface {ref}`example-petsc-area` of a tensor-product discrete sphere, obtained by projecting a cube inscribed in a sphere onto the surface of the sphere.
46This discrete surface is sometimes referred to as a cubed-sphere (an example of such as a surface is given in figure {numref}`fig-cubed-sphere`).
47This problem can be run with:
48
49```
50./area -problem sphere
51```
52
53(fig-cubed-sphere)=
54
55:::{figure} ../../../../img/CubedSphere.svg
56Example of a cubed-sphere, i.e., a tensor-product discrete sphere, obtained by
57projecting a cube inscribed in a sphere onto the surface of the sphere.
58:::
59
60This example uses the following coordinate transformations for the computation of the geometric factors: from the physical coordinates on the sphere, denoted by $\overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}=(\overset{\circ}{x},\overset{\circ}{y},\overset{\circ}{z})$, and physical coordinates on the discrete surface, denoted by $\bm{{x}}=(x,y,z)$ (depicted, for simplicity, as coordinates on a circle and 1D linear element in figure {numref}`fig-sphere-coords`), to $\bm{X}=(X,Y) \in \textrm{I}$ on the reference element, via the chain rule
61
62$$
63\frac{\partial \overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}}_{(3\times2)} = \frac{\partial \overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{x}}_{(3\times3)} \frac{\partial\bm{x}}{\partial \bm{X}}_{(3\times2)} ,
64$$ (eq-coordinate-transforms-sphere)
65
66with Jacobian determinant given by
67
68$$
69\left| J \right| = \left| col_1\left(\frac{\partial \overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}}\right) \times col_2 \left(\frac{\partial \overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}}\right)\right| .
70$$ (eq-jacobian-sphere)
71
72(fig-sphere-coords)=
73
74:::{figure} ../../../../img/SphereSketch.svg
75Sketch of coordinates mapping between a 1D linear element and a circle.
76In the case of a linear element the two nodes, $p_0$ and $p_1$, marked by red crosses, coincide with the endpoints of the element.
77Two quadrature points, $q_0$ and $q_1$, marked by blue dots, with physical coordinates denoted by $\bm x(\bm X)$, are mapped to their corresponding radial projections on the circle, which have coordinates $\overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}(\bm x)$.
78:::
79
80We note that in equation {eq}`eq-coordinate-transforms-sphere`, the right-most Jacobian matrix ${\partial\bm{x}}/{\partial \bm{X}}_{(3\times2)}$ is provided by the library, while ${\partial \overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}/{\partial \bm{x}}_{(3\times3)}$ is provided by the user with analytical derivatives.
81In particular, for a sphere of radius 1, we have
82
83$$
84\overset{\circ}{\bm x}(\bm x) = \frac{1}{\lVert \bm x \rVert} \bm x_{(3\times 1)}
85$$
86
87and thus
88
89$$
90\frac{\partial \overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{x}} = \frac{1}{\lVert \bm x \rVert} \bm I_{(3\times 3)} - \frac{1}{\lVert \bm x \rVert^3} (\bm x \bm x^T)_{(3\times 3)} .
91$$
92
93(example-petsc-bps)=
94
95## Bakeoff problems and generalizations
96
97The PETSc examples in this directory include a full suite of parallel {ref}`bakeoff problems <bps>` (BPs) using a "raw" parallel decomposition (see `bpsraw.c`) and using PETSc's `DMPlex` for unstructured grid management (see `bps.c`).
98A generalization of these BPs to the surface of the cubed-sphere are available in `bpssphere.c`.
99
100(example-petsc-bps-sphere)=
101
102### Bakeoff problems on the cubed-sphere
103
104For the $L^2$ projection problems, BP1-BP2, that use the mass operator, the coordinate transformations and the corresponding Jacobian determinant, equation {eq}`eq-jacobian-sphere`, are the same as in the {ref}`example-petsc-area-sphere` example.
105For the Poisson's problem, BP3-BP6, on the cubed-sphere, in addition to equation {eq}`eq-jacobian-sphere`, the pseudo-inverse of $\partial \overset{\circ}{\bm{x}} / \partial \bm{X}$ is used to derive the contravariant metric tensor (please see figure {numref}`fig-sphere-coords` for a reference of the notation used).
106We begin by expressing the Moore-Penrose (left) pseudo-inverse:
107
108$$
109\frac{\partial \bm{X}}{\partial \overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}_{(2\times 3)} \equiv \left(\frac{\partial \overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}}\right)_{(2\times 3)}^{+} =  \left(\frac{\partial \overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}}_{(2\times3)}^T \frac{\partial\overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}}_{(3\times2)} \right)^{-1} \frac{\partial \overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}}_{(2\times3)}^T .
110$$ (eq-dxcircdX-pseudo-inv)
111
112This enables computation of gradients of an arbitrary function $u(\overset{\circ}{\bm x})$ in the embedding space as
113
114$$
115\frac{\partial u}{\partial \overset{\circ}{\bm x}}_{(1\times 3)} = \frac{\partial u}{\partial \bm X}_{(1\times 2)} \frac{\partial \bm X}{\partial \overset{\circ}{\bm x}}_{(2\times 3)}
116$$
117
118and thus the weak Laplacian may be expressed as
119
120$$
121\int_{\Omega} \frac{\partial v}{\partial \overset\circ{\bm x}} \left( \frac{\partial u}{\partial \overset\circ{\bm x}} \right)^T \, dS
122    = \int_{\Omega} \frac{\partial v}{\partial \bm X} \underbrace{\frac{\partial \bm X}{\partial \overset\circ{\bm x}} \left( \frac{\partial \bm X}{\partial \overset\circ{\bm x}} \right)^T}_{\bm g_{(2\times 2)}}  \left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial \bm X} \right)^T \, dS
123$$ (eq-weak-laplace-sphere)
124
125where we have identified the $2\times 2$ contravariant metric tensor $\bm g$ (sometimes written $\bm g^{ij}$), and where now $\Omega$ represents the surface of the sphere, which is a two-dimensional closed surface embedded in the three-dimensional Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^3$.
126This expression can be simplified to avoid the explicit Moore-Penrose pseudo-inverse,
127
128$$
129\bm g = \left(\frac{\partial \overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}}^T \frac{\partial\overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}} \right)^{-1}_{(2\times 2)} \frac{\partial \overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}}_{(2\times3)}^T \frac{\partial \overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}}_{(3\times2)} \left(\frac{\partial \overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}}^T \frac{\partial\overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}} \right)^{-T}_{(2\times 2)} = \left(\frac{\partial \overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}}^T \frac{\partial\overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}} \right)^{-1}_{(2\times 2)}
130$$
131
132where we have dropped the transpose due to symmetry.
133This allows us to simplify {eq}`eq-weak-laplace-sphere` as
134
135$$
136\int_{\Omega} \frac{\partial v}{\partial \overset\circ{\bm x}} \left( \frac{\partial u}{\partial \overset\circ{\bm x}} \right)^T \, dS     = \int_{\Omega} \frac{\partial v}{\partial \bm X} \underbrace{\left(\frac{\partial \overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}}^T \frac{\partial\overset{\circ}{\bm{x}}}{\partial \bm{X}} \right)^{-1}}_{\bm g_{(2\times 2)}}  \left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial \bm X} \right)^T \, dS ,
137$$
138
139which is the form implemented in `qfunctions/bps/bp3sphere.h`.
140
141(example-petsc-multigrid)=
142
143## Multigrid
144
145This example is located in the subdirectory {file}`examples/petsc`.
146It investigates $p$-multigrid for the Poisson problem, equation {eq}`eq-variable-coeff-poisson`, using an unstructured high-order finite element discretization.
147All of the operators associated with the geometric multigrid are implemented in libCEED.
148
149$$
150-\nabla\cdot \left( \kappa \left( x \right) \nabla x \right) = g \left( x \right)
151$$ (eq-variable-coeff-poisson)
152
153The Poisson operator can be specified with the decomposition given by the equation in figure {ref}`fig-operator-decomp`, and the restriction and prolongation operators given by interpolation basis operations, $\bm{B}$, and $\bm{B}^T$, respectively, act on the different grid levels with corresponding element restrictions, $\bm{G}$.
154These three operations can be exploited by existing matrix-free multigrid software and smoothers.
155Preconditioning based on the libCEED finite element operator decomposition is an ongoing area of research.
156