| /petsc/src/ksp/ksp/impls/bcgsl/ |
| H A D | bcgsl.c | 21 PetscInt h, i, j, k, vi, ell; in KSPSolve_BCGSL() local 29 ell = bcgsl->ell; in KSPSolve_BCGSL() 37 vi += ell + 1; in KSPSolve_BCGSL() 39 vi += ell + 1; in KSPSolve_BCGSL() 42 PetscCall(PetscBLASIntCast(ell + 1, &ldMZ)); in KSPSolve_BCGSL() 79 for (k = 0; k < maxit; k += bcgsl->ell) { in KSPSolve_BCGSL() 99 for (j = 0; j < bcgsl->ell; j++) { in KSPSolve_BCGSL() 155 for (i = 0; i <= bcgsl->ell; ++i) PetscCall(VecMDot(VVR[i], i + 1, VVR, &MZa[i * ldMZ])); in KSPSolve_BCGSL() 157 for (i = 0; i <= bcgsl->ell; ++i) { in KSPSolve_BCGSL() 158 …for (j = i + 1; j <= bcgsl->ell; ++j) MZa[i * ldMZ + j] = MZa[j * ldMZ + i] = PetscConj(MZa[j * ld… in KSPSolve_BCGSL() [all …]
|
| H A D | bcgslimpl.h | 9 PetscInt ell; /* Number of search directions. */ member
|
| /petsc/src/ts/tutorials/output/ |
| H A D | ex30_annulus.out | 16 0 TS: time 0., energy 32.5981, intp 0., ell 0. 18 1 TS: time 0.1, energy 32.1116, intp 4.7611e-110, ell 0. 20 2 TS: time 0.2, energy 31.6199, intp -1.27448e-109, ell 0.
|
| H A D | ex30_hdf5_diagnostic.out | 16 0 TS: time 0., energy 19.568, intp 0., ell 0. 18 1 TS: time 0.1, energy 18.8916, intp 4.7611e-110, ell 0. 20 2 TS: time 0.2, energy 18.1977, intp 6.00335e-110, ell 0.
|
| H A D | ex30_vtk_diagnostic.out | 16 0 TS: time 0., energy 19.568, intp 0., ell 0. 18 1 TS: time 0.1, energy 18.8916, intp 4.7611e-110, ell 0. 20 2 TS: time 0.2, energy 18.1977, intp 6.00335e-110, ell 0.
|
| H A D | ex30_full_cdisc_minres.out | 14 0 TS: time 0., energy 1.29708, intp -1.90582e-21, ell 0. 16 1 TS: time 0.1, energy 1.24891, intp 1.53525e-21, ell 0.
|
| H A D | ex30_full_cdisc.out | 14 0 TS: time 0., energy 1.29708, intp -1.90582e-21, ell 0. 16 1 TS: time 0.1, energy 1.24891, intp -1.90582e-21, ell 0.
|
| H A D | ex30_full_cdisc_split.out | 14 0 TS: time 0., energy 1.29708, intp -1.90582e-21, ell 0. 19 1 TS: time 0.1, energy 1.25174, intp 2.2764e-21, ell 0.
|
| H A D | ex30_0.out | 20 0 TS: time 0., energy 0.796955, intp -3.07049e-21, ell 0. 24 1 TS: time 0.1, energy 0.727067, intp 1.27055e-21, ell 0.
|
| H A D | ex30_0_p4est_periodic.out | 20 0 TS: time 0., energy 0.763392, intp -5.02926e-22, ell 0. 24 1 TS: time 0.1, energy 0.6889, intp -1.85288e-22, ell 0.
|
| H A D | ex30_0_3d.out | 20 0 TS: time 0., energy 0.94281, intp 0., ell 0. 24 1 TS: time 0.1, energy 0.914191, intp 1.32349e-23, ell 0.
|
| H A D | ex30_0_p4est.out | 20 0 TS: time 0., energy 0.827553, intp 1.71524e-20, ell 0. 24 1 TS: time 0.1, energy 0.759435, intp -2.64698e-21, ell 0.
|
| H A D | ex30_0_periodic.out | 20 0 TS: time 0., energy 0.781942, intp 8.73503e-22, ell 0. 24 1 TS: time 0.1, energy 0.711252, intp -3.97047e-22, ell 0.
|
| H A D | ex30_0_split.out | 20 0 TS: time 0., energy 0.796955, intp -3.07049e-21, ell 0. 24 1 TS: time 0.1, energy 0.736711, intp 4.5528e-21, ell 0.
|
| H A D | ex30_0_p4est_mg.out | 20 0 TS: time 0., energy 0.745385, intp 3.04932e-20, ell 0. 28 1 TS: time 0.1, energy 0.670449, intp 4.40457e-20, ell 0.
|
| H A D | ex30_0_dirk_fieldsplit.out | 20 0 TS: time 0., energy 0.796955, intp -3.07049e-21, ell 0. 30 1 TS: time 0.1, energy 0.733515, intp 4.65868e-21, ell 0.
|
| H A D | ex30_0_dirk.out | 20 0 TS: time 0., energy 0.796955, intp -3.07049e-21, ell 0. 30 1 TS: time 0.1, energy 0.728119, intp -9.52912e-22, ell 0.
|
| H A D | ex30_0_dirk_mg.out | 20 0 TS: time 0., energy 0.796955, intp -3.07049e-21, ell 0. 36 1 TS: time 0.1, energy 0.728179, intp 2.85874e-21, ell 0.
|
| /petsc/doc/overview/ |
| H A D | linear_solve_table.md | 593 * - Stabilized Bi-Conjugate Gradients with length :math:`\ell` recurrence 648 * - Pipelined depth :math:`\ell` Conjugate Gradient
|
| /petsc/doc/manual/ |
| H A D | tao.md | 2631 $\ell \in \{\mathbb R\cup \{-\infty\}\}^n$ and 2633 $\ell \leq u$. Given this information, 2634 $\mathbf{x}^* \in [\ell,u]$ is a solution to 2635 MCP($F$, $\ell$, $u$) if for each 2647 Note that when $\ell = \{-\infty\}^n$ and 2649 $\ell = \{0\}^n$ and $u = \{\infty\}^n$ correspond to the 2656 MCP($\nabla f$, $\ell$, $u$), where 2669 prior to solving the application. The bounds, $[\ell,u]$, on the 2741 remain feasible with respect to the bounds, $[\ell, u]$, and is 2769 outside of the box, $[\ell,u]$, perhaps because of the presence of [all …]
|
| /petsc/doc/ |
| H A D | petsc.bib | 19951 title = {Exploiting {BiCGstab($\ell$)} strategies to induce dimension reduction},
|